Redesign of the National Hospital Discharge Survey
Conceptual Framework and Feasibility Study: Final Report
ResearchPublished Apr 24, 2007
Conceptual Framework and Feasibility Study: Final Report
ResearchPublished Apr 24, 2007
Since its inception more than 40 years ago, the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) has been a principal source of information on inpatient utilization in short-stay, nonfederal hospitals in the United States. However, it is based on concepts of the health care delivery system and hospital and patient universe of previous decades. For the NHDS to remain relevant, it must reflect the types of care and services now offered in American hospitals. The National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, asked RAND Health to assist in the first phase of the redesign effort by developing an approach for redesigning the survey and identifying, through a feasibility study, specific data elements to be included and field procedures to be used in that survey. New data elements recommended add clinical and financial depth and breadth, and the ability to link facility structure to process and outcomes of care. The survey also provides a structure for incorporating modules that can focus in detail on selected issues.
This report documents the findings from this study and includes appendixes containing the names of people and institutions involved in the study and the forms and surveys used in the study and revised in light of the findings.
The research described in this report was prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics and conducted within RAND Health, a division of the RAND Corporation.
This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.