A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base

Roland J. Yardley, John F. Schank, James G. Kallimani, Raj Raman, Clifford A. Grammich

ResearchPublished Jul 29, 2007

The U.S. Navy has implemented the Fleet Response Plan (FRP), which provides for an increased surge capability by Carrier Strike Groups. Although regularly scheduled six-month deployments still occur, aircraft carriers achieve a high state of readiness early and sustain the readiness for a longer period. This increased readiness provides the Navy with a more responsive aircraft carrier fleet and with the ability to employ aircraft carriers more flexibly.

The analysis focused on the demands of ten Nimitz-class carriers, which will be in operation over the next two decades. We used a model based on the supply of and demand for workers at the primary naval shipyards that service aircraft carriers, to estimate the magnitude and timing of work (demand). The modeling used naval shipyard-provided data that forecast the supply of workers and maintenance demands of aircraft carriers and all other ships. We varied the aircraft carrier maintenance cycles and size of work packages to focus on the effects that they would have on the demand for workers at Norfolk Naval Shipyard and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility.

The Program Executive Office for Aircraft Carriers tasked the RAND Corporation to examine the effect of the extension of time between depot maintenance availabilities, the increased use of continuous-maintenance periods, and the potential reductions in the size of the aircraft carrier fleet on the industrial base for aircraft carrier maintenance — the public and private shipyards and depots that maintain and repair aircraft carriers. The modeling revealed that increasing carrier maintenance-cycle length can reduce the number of carriers in maintenance and make more carriers available to deploy or surge. However, implementing longer cycles must be timed carefully to prevent problems in managing the workforce of the maintenance industrial base.

This report should be of interest to persons concerned with the operational availability and readiness of Navy aircraft carriers under the Fleet Response Plan, including those in the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), the Fleet Forces Command, and the Type Commanders.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
94 pages
List Price
$32.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2007
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 94
  • Paperback Price: $32.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-4182-1
  • Document Number: TR-480-NAVY

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Yardley, Roland J., John F. Schank, James G. Kallimani, Raj Raman, and Clifford A. Grammich, A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base, RAND Corporation, TR-480-NAVY, 2007. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR480.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Yardley, Roland J., John F. Schank, James G. Kallimani, Raj Raman, and Clifford A. Grammich, A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR480.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was prepared for the United States Navy. The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.