A Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Aircraft Carrier Operational Cycles on the Maintenance Industrial Base
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback94 pages | $32.00 | $25.60 20% Web Discount |
The U.S. Navy has implemented the Fleet Response Plan (FRP), which provides for an increased surge capability by Carrier Strike Groups. Although regularly scheduled six-month deployments still occur, aircraft carriers achieve a high state of readiness early and sustain the readiness for a longer period. This increased readiness provides the Navy with a more responsive aircraft carrier fleet and with the ability to employ aircraft carriers more flexibly.
The analysis focused on the demands of ten Nimitz-class carriers, which will be in operation over the next two decades. We used a model based on the supply of and demand for workers at the primary naval shipyards that service aircraft carriers, to estimate the magnitude and timing of work (demand). The modeling used naval shipyard-provided data that forecast the supply of workers and maintenance demands of aircraft carriers and all other ships. We varied the aircraft carrier maintenance cycles and size of work packages to focus on the effects that they would have on the demand for workers at Norfolk Naval Shipyard and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility.
The Program Executive Office for Aircraft Carriers tasked the RAND Corporation to examine the effect of the extension of time between depot maintenance availabilities, the increased use of continuous-maintenance periods, and the potential reductions in the size of the aircraft carrier fleet on the industrial base for aircraft carrier maintenance — the public and private shipyards and depots that maintain and repair aircraft carriers. The modeling revealed that increasing carrier maintenance-cycle length can reduce the number of carriers in maintenance and make more carriers available to deploy or surge. However, implementing longer cycles must be timed carefully to prevent problems in managing the workforce of the maintenance industrial base.
This report should be of interest to persons concerned with the operational availability and readiness of Navy aircraft carriers under the Fleet Response Plan, including those in the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), the Fleet Forces Command, and the Type Commanders.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Overview of Aircraft Carrier Maintenance and FRP Cycles
Chapter Three
Modeling the Maintenance Industrial Base
Chapter Four
Development and Analysis of Alternative Maintenance Strategies
Chapter Five
Effects on the Industrial Base
Chapter Six
Effects on Operational Availability
Chapter Seven
Summary and Concluding Observations
Appendix A
The One Shipyard Concept
Appendix B
Mapping of Trade Skills
Appendix C
Other Work Performed at Naval Shipyards
Appendix D
Evaluation of Supply and Demand for Representative Trade Skills
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was prepared for the United States Navy. The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.