Finding Candidate Options for Investment
From Building Blocks to Composite Options and Preliminary Screening
ResearchPublished Mar 24, 2008
This report describes and documents a methodology and a prototype tool, the Building Blocks To Composite Options Tool (BCOT), for identifying investment options suitable to a particular defense capability area. The report is intended primarily for users of BCOT and those who will extend its functionality in the future, i.e., working analysts and modelers. The methodology ensures that a broad range of investment options is considered initially. It then uses a screening technique to narrow the range to those deemed worthy of more-extensive assessment in a fuller portfolio-analysis framework, such as an assessment using RAND’s Portfolio Analysis Tool (PAT). The methodology draws upon some classic techniques from economics and operations research but extends them significantly and suggests pragmatic approximations in applications, particularly in capabilities-based planning. BCOT has been implemented in both Analytica® and Microsoft Excel.® However, it is a prototype, not a finished product. Much work is needed to fully develop exploratory-analysis techniques needed to assure robustness of results. The most important next step is to hone the exploratory-analysis concepts with a relatively complex application that includes many uncertainties about relative emphasis of scenarios and assumptions to be made in estimating effectiveness.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 2008
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 86
- Paperback Price: $23.00
- Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-4219-4
- Document Number: TR-501-OSD
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Davis, Paul K., Russell D. Shaver, Gaga Gvineria, and Justin Beck, Finding Candidate Options for Investment: From Building Blocks to Composite Options and Preliminary Screening, RAND Corporation, TR-501-OSD, 2008. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR501.html
Davis, Paul K., Russell D. Shaver, Gaga Gvineria, and Justin Beck, Finding Candidate Options for Investment: From Building Blocks to Composite Options and Preliminary Screening. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR501.html. Also available in print form.
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and draws also on research for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). The research was accomplished in the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center (ATPC) of RAND’s National Defense Research Institute (NDRI), a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.