Cover: Between politics and clinics -- the many faces of biomedical policy in Europe

Between politics and clinics -- the many faces of biomedical policy in Europe

Analysis of drivers and outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technologies policy -- Volume II: Three country case studies

Published Nov 16, 2008

by Annalijn Conklin, Daniel Jones, Lisa Klautzer, Alice Farrands, Sarah Olmstead, Miriam Shergold, Carlo Drauth, Stijn Hoorens

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Now thirty years on from the first “test-tube baby”, assisted reproduction continues to feature in the media and is high on the political agendas in many countries in Europe. Our study aimed to shed light on the substantial differences in the way governments have shaped their Assisted Reproductive Technologies policy by studying three European countries in depth — France, Italy and the UK. Organised in two volumes, we report our findings and analysis of a comparative study on ART policy in these three countries based on an extensive iterative review of the evidence and collection of country-specific information gathered for the three country case studies. In brief, we found that ART policy has many faces despite a common European regulatory framework for human tissues and cells; although there are differences in economic contexts between countries, all have a proportion of individual payment; and, good clinical practice can be trumped by regulatory restrictions as well as funding arrangements, leading to undesired health outcomes and even cross-border travel. We also identified a number of different underlying factors driving the differences in ART policy between the three countries. In concluding, we offer a number of recommendations towards addressing the key challenges of such context-specific differences.

This report will be of interest to policymakers, clinicians, patients and researchers who are concerned with the regulation, policy implementation, funding and clinical practice of ART and its wider context and outcomes.

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was supported by a grant from Schering-Plough and was conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.