Defaulting In and Cashing Out?

The Impact of Retirement Plan Design on the Savings Accumulation of Separating Employees

Angela A. Hung, Jill E. Luoto, Jeremy Burke

Published Nov 11, 2015

The shift to defined contribution (DC) retirement savings plans among employers has given both more freedom and more responsibility to employees who must decide whether and how much to save for retirement. Importantly, DC plans allow employees to decide what to do with their accumulated savings at points of job separation. While the advent of automatic enrollment (AE) policies has helped increase overall participation rates in DC plans, little consideration has been given to the interplay between the rise of AE policies and what happens to accumulated retirement savings at points of job separation. We use administrative data from Vanguard covering the accounts of over a half million participants from 385 plans to explore the participation and distribution decisions of those who separate from their employers. We find that job separation is a significant source of leakages from retirement accounts among our sample. Over 50 percent of separating employees take a cash distribution. Notably, even after controlling for income and account balance size, those separating from AE plans are significantly more likely to take a cash distribution than are those separating from plans in which they enrolled voluntarily. Though AE policies may help encourage retirement savings among those who otherwise would not save, such policies may fail to realize their full potential if savings accumulated during periods of employment effectively dissipate at points of job separation, and with taxes and penalties paid out in some cases.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hung, Angela A., Jill E. Luoto, and Jeremy Burke, Defaulting In and Cashing Out? The Impact of Retirement Plan Design on the Savings Accumulation of Separating Employees. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1115.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.