Cover: Richting een beleidsevaluatie cultuur in Nederland

Richting een beleidsevaluatie cultuur in Nederland

Identificatie van knelpunten en oplossingrichtingen [Towards a Policy Evaluation Culture in the Netherlands: Identification of challenges and directions for solutions]

Published Aug 4, 2005

by Stijn Hoorens, Wija J. Oortwijn

Download eBook for Free

(Dutch-language version)

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

In the Netherlands, there is an increasing interest for accountability of public governance and the quality of public policy. However, coordination of policy evaluation and the quality of these evaluations can be questioned sometimes. While most ministries pay due attention to the validity and reliability of evaluation studies, the objectivity and independence of these evaluations could improve. In many cases a transparent procedure is lacking and stakeholders feel they are being left out of the process. On the basis of a literature review and interviews with stakeholders this report identifies the main issues in the current practice of policy evaluation in the Netherlands. Furthermore, a number of criteria are suggested that, when met, would fulfil the need for a credible evaluation. In case the Netherlands aim at establishing an evidence-base for public policy, policy evaluation should become more integrated into the policy cycle. This will require an evolvement of an evaluation culture, characterised by interdepartmental coordination, transparency, and credibility. This working report recommends gaining insights from abroad to learn from factors of success and failure of policy evaluation that can contribute to reach the goal of an evaluation culture in the Netherlands.

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was conducted by by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.