Improving Performance for Health Plan Customer Service
A Case Study of a Successful CAHPS Quality Improvement Intervention
Published Aug 28, 2007
This report describes the successful efforts of one full-service health plan to improve customer service for its members. Customer experience ratings provided by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey indicated that the customer service capabilities of the health plan needed to be improved. The plan adopted a six-step approach to quality improvement based on the well-established Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle: (1) Use CAHPS to flag problems. Confirm CAHPS findings with other plan data. (2) Select performance measures. Develop new ones if needed. (3) Set goals for improvement and write an action plan. (4) Implement the action plan. (5) Assess progress and refine the intervention. (6) Monitor improvements to make sure they hold. The health plan went through the PDSA cycle twice until it developed a mix of intervention strategies that produced results.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Year: 2007
- Pages: 42
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/WR517
- Document Number: WR-517-AHRQ
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Quigley, Denise D., Shelley H. Wiseman, and Donna O. Farley, Improving Performance for Health Plan Customer Service: A Case Study of a Successful CAHPS Quality Improvement Intervention, RAND Corporation, WR-517-AHRQ, 2007. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR517.html
Quigley, Denise D., Shelley H. Wiseman, and Donna O. Farley, Improving Performance for Health Plan Customer Service: A Case Study of a Successful CAHPS Quality Improvement Intervention. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR517.html.
The research described in this report was prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and was performed under the auspices of RAND Health.
This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.