Work Disability, Work, and Justification Bias in Europe and the U.S.

Arie Kapteyn, James P. Smith, Arthur Van Soest

Published Oct 22, 2009

To analyze the effect of health on work, many studies use a simple self-assessed health measure based upon a question such as “do you have an impairment or health problem limiting the kind or amount of work you can do?” A possible drawback of such a measure is the possibility that different groups of respondents may use different response scales. This is commonly referred to as “differential item functioning” (DIF). A specific form of DIF is justification bias: to justify the fact that they don’t work, non-working respondents may classify a given health problem as a more serious work limitation than working respondents. In this paper the authors use anchoring vignettes to identify justification bias and other forms of DIF across countries and socio-economic groups among older workers in the U.S. and Europe. Generally, they find differences in response scales across countries, partly related to social insurance generosity and employment protection. Furthermore, they find significant evidence of justification bias in the U.S. but not in Europe, suggesting differences in social norms concerning work.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Kapteyn, Arie, James P. Smith, and Arthur Van Soest, Work Disability, Work, and Justification Bias in Europe and the U.S. RAND Corporation, WR-696, 2009. As of September 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR696.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Kapteyn, Arie, James P. Smith, and Arthur Van Soest, Work Disability, Work, and Justification Bias in Europe and the U.S. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR696.html.
BibTeX RIS

This paper series was made possible by the NIA funded RAND Center for the Study of Aging and the NICHD funded RAND Population Research Center.

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.