Cover: Technical Detail and Appendices for a Study of Neighborhood Archetypes for Population Health Research

Technical Detail and Appendices for a Study of Neighborhood Archetypes for Population Health Research

Published Nov 9, 2010

by Margaret M. Weden, Chloe E. Bird, Jose J. Escarce, Nicole Lurie

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The principal objective of this study is to characterize the places in which people live by factors associated with physical and mental wellbeing. The authors demonstrate a new approach that employs neighborhood measures such as social environment, built environment, commuting and migration, and demographics and household composition to classify neighborhoods into archetypes. The number of neighborhood archetypes, their defining attributes, and their change/stability between 1990 and 2000 is analyzed using latent class analysis applied to a rich array of data sources. In both years, six archetypes of U.S. neighborhoods are differentiated which occur at prevalence from 13% to 20%: Mobile single-household, urbanites; Low SES, rural; Poor, urban, minority; Low SES, urban, minority commuters; High SES, foreign born, new home owners; and Middle-class suburban/exurban families. Findings show that neighborhoods have remained notably constant between 1990 and 2000, with 76.4% of the neighborhoods categorized as the same archetype ten years later. The approach to defining neighborhood archetypes translates the theoretical aspects of research on neighborhoods and health into a measurement typology that can be employed in applied research questions such as public health surveillance and planning and which can be replicated and extended for use in other historical, geographical, and substantive applications.

This paper series was made possible by the NIA funded RAND Center for the Study of Aging and the NICHD funded RAND Population Research Center.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.