The Effect of a Medical School's Admission and Curriculum Policies on Increasing the Number of Physicians in Primary Care Specialties

Published in: Academic Medicine, v. 71, no. 3, Mar. 1996, p. 293-295

Posted on on January 01, 1996

by Janice Barnhart, Paul G. Shekelle, Charles Lewis

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, which is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA School of Medicine, has a mission to increase the number of physicians pursuing careers in primary care and/or providing care to the underserved. The authors sought to determine whether Drew's initial classes are pursuing career paths consistent with the institution's mission. In June 1992 the alumni from the Drew and UCLA classes of 1985 through 1987 were mailed questionnaires to ascertain their specialty choices and practice settings. Responses were analyzed using bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression. The response rates were 89% (402 of 454) for the UCLA graduates and 76% (44 of 58) for the Drew graduates. Bivariate analyses showed that Hispanics, women, older individuals, and Drew graduates were more likely to choose primary care specialties (p < .001 for each variable). Multiple logistic regression also showed that these variables predicted primary care career choice: for being a Hispanic, odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, 95% CI (1.66, 6.35); for being a woman, OR = 1.9, 95% CI (1.28, 2.97); for being older, OR = .92, 95% CI (.86, .99); and for being a Drew graduate, OR = 2.4, 95% CI (1.09, 5.27). Older graduates practiced in underserved areas more than did younger ones. To some degree, the authors conclude, Drew has fulfilled its mission of graduating physicians who are primary care specialists and/or practice in underserved areas; however, the results raise questions regarding possible early influences on career choice.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.