Spring 2007 TEEG Survey Results Chi-Square Analyses by Grade Level

Published in: Policy Evaluation Report / (Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Peabody College, Spring 2007), p. 127

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2007

by Matthew G. Springer, Michael John Podgursky, Dennis W. Jansen, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Laura S. Hamilton, Omar S. Lopez, Christine H. Patterson, Brian M. Stecher

This report presents findings from the first-year evaluation of the Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) program, one of several statewide performance incentive programs in Texas. In June 2006, Governor Perry and the 79th Texas Legislature created the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program, one component of which is the TEEG program. TEEG Cycle 1 provided approximately $100 million in noncompetitive, 12-month grants to over 1,100 public schools. Schools eligible to participate had records of academic success and high percentages of economically disadvantaged students. This report, Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Program: Year One Evaluation Report, includes (1) an overview of the TEEG school selection criteria; (2) a review of the program design features of TEEG Cycle 1 schools' performance incentive plans; (3) analyses from a survey of teachers' attitudes and behaviors in TEEG Cycle 1 schools; and (4) findings from interviews with schools that decided not to participate in TEEG Cycle 1. While these findings are preliminary, they do offer insight into the experiences of educators during the first year of TEEG implementation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.