Cover: Modeling Health Care Policy Alternatives

Modeling Health Care Policy Alternatives

Published in: HSR, Health Services Research, v. 45, no. 5, pt. 2, Oct. 2010, p. 1541-1558

Posted on 2010

by Jeanne S. Ringel, Christine Eibner, Federico Girosi, Amado Cordova, Elizabeth A. McGlynn

BACKGROUND: Computer models played an important role in the health care reform debate, and they will continue to be used during implementation. However, current models are limited by inputs, including available data. Aim. We review microsimulation and cell-based models. For each type of model, we discuss data requirements and other factors that may affect its scope. We also discuss how to improve models by changing data collection and data access procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We review the modeling literature, documentation on existing models, and data resources available to modelers. RESULTS: Even with limitations, models can be a useful resource. However, limitations must be clearly communicated. Modeling approaches could be improved by enhancing existing longitudinal data, improving access to linked data, and developing data focused on health care providers. DISCUSSION: Longitudinal datasets could be improved by standardizing questions across surveys or by fielding supplemental panels. Funding could be provided to identify causal parameters and to clarify ranges of effects reported in the literature. Finally, a forum for routine communication between modelers and policy makers could be established. CONCLUSION: Modeling can provide useful information for health care policy makers. Thus, investing in tools to improve modeling capabilities should be a high priority.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.