Medical Mistrust Is Related to Lower Longitudinal Medication Adherence Among African-American Males with HIV

Sannisha K. Dale, Laura M. Bogart, Glenn Wagner, Frank H. Galvan, David J. Klein

ResearchPosted on rand.org 2014Published in: Journal of Health Psychology, 2014

African-Americans living with HIV show worse health behaviors (e.g. medication adherence) and outcomes (e.g. viral suppression) than do their White counterparts. In a 6-month longitudinal study, we investigated whether medical mistrust among African-American males with HIV (214 enrolled, 140 with longitudinal data) predicted lower electronically monitored antiretroviral medication adherence. General medical mistrust (e.g. suspicion toward providers), but not racism-related mistrust (e.g. belief that providers treat African-Americans poorly due to race), predicted lower continuous medication adherence over time (b = -.08, standard error = .04, p = .03). Medical mistrust may contribute to poor health outcomes. Intervention efforts that address mistrust may improve adherence among African-Americans with HIV.

Key Finding

Medical mistrust among African-American males with HIV predicts lower medication adherence over time and may help to explain disparities in medication adherence rates (as well as related HIV health outcomes) between African-Americans and other racial/ethnic groups.

Recommendation

Intervention efforts at the societal, medical system, and individual levels targeting medical mistrust may help to reduce health disparities and improve medication adherence for African-Americans with HIV.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2014
  • Pages: 11
  • Document Number: EP-50532

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.