Managing Officer Behavioural Risk Using Early Intervention Systems

Addressing System Design Challenges for Law Enforcement and Corrections Environments

Published in: Policing, Volume 11, Issue 1 (March 2017), Pages 103-117. doi: 10.1093/police/paw028

Posted on on November 07, 2017

by Brian A. Jackson, Vivian L. Towe, Lisa Wagner, Priscillia Hunt, Sarah Michal Greathouse, John S. Hollywood

Read More

Access further information on this document at Policing

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Since inappropriate and illegal behaviour by officers in criminal justice agencies seriously undermines their ability to achieve their roles and maintain public trust, identifying problematic officers to enable early intervention has become a priority in both departmental management and agency oversight. Events such as officer use of force incidents have been widely used as indicators to flag officers by such systems. Though officers who use force frequently or receive many citizen complaints are a concern, such counts are unlikely to be sufficient to address the full range of officer behaviours of concern. This article describes development of an early intervention system seeking to take this broader view. The system uses data from officers severely disciplined or terminated for various reasons and examines a range of indicators associated with these outcomes. The effort includes officers in both law enforcement and corrections roles, exploring the application of such systems in corrections.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.