Examination of Mediators and Moderators to Understand How and in What Context Game Changers Increases HIV Prevention Advocacy Among Persons Living With HIV in Uganda

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2021). doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09983-z

Posted on RAND.org on April 28, 2021

by Glenn Wagner, Laura M. Bogart, David J. Klein, Harold D. Green, Andrew Kambugu, Joan Nampiima, Joseph K. Matovu

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Background

Our randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the group-based Game Changers intervention demonstrated effects on the primary goal of increased HIV-protective behaviors among social network members (alters), via the mechanism of increased participant engagement in HIV prevention advocacy with alters. We sought to understand how and in what context the intervention has its effects by examining specific mediators and moderators of the intervention's effect on increased prevention advocacy.

Methods

The RCT was conducted with 98 adult PLWH in Uganda. Intervention content targeted internalized HIV stigma, HIV disclosure, positive living behaviors, and self-efficacy for advocacy; these constructs were examined as intervention mediators (at the 5-month follow-up) of advocacy effects reported at the 8-month follow-up. Baseline sample characteristics were explored as moderators.

Results

Internalized HIV stigma and HIV disclosure mediated intervention effects on prevention advocacy, but not antiretroviral adherence or self-efficacy for advocacy. Moderators of the intervention effect included several network characteristics (trust in, support from, stigma from, and connectedness among network members), but not respondent socio-demographics or HIV disease characteristics. The intervention was associated with greater prevention advocacy when trust in, support from, and connectedness among alters were high, and stigma from alters was low.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of helping PLWH cope with self-stigma and gain comfort with disclosure, as well as the potential influence of network support, trustworthiness, connectedness, and stigmatization on engagement in prevention advocacy.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.