Examination of Mediators and Moderators to Understand How and in What Context Game Changers Increases HIV Prevention Advocacy Among Persons Living With HIV in Uganda

Glenn Wagner, Laura M. Bogart, David J. Klein, Harold D. Green, Andrew Kambugu, Joan Nampiima, Joseph K. Matovu

ResearchPosted on rand.org Apr 28, 2021Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2021). doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09983-z

Background

Our randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the group-based Game Changers intervention demonstrated effects on the primary goal of increased HIV-protective behaviors among social network members (alters), via the mechanism of increased participant engagement in HIV prevention advocacy with alters. We sought to understand how and in what context the intervention has its effects by examining specific mediators and moderators of the intervention's effect on increased prevention advocacy.

Methods

The RCT was conducted with 98 adult PLWH in Uganda. Intervention content targeted internalized HIV stigma, HIV disclosure, positive living behaviors, and self-efficacy for advocacy; these constructs were examined as intervention mediators (at the 5-month follow-up) of advocacy effects reported at the 8-month follow-up. Baseline sample characteristics were explored as moderators.

Results

Internalized HIV stigma and HIV disclosure mediated intervention effects on prevention advocacy, but not antiretroviral adherence or self-efficacy for advocacy. Moderators of the intervention effect included several network characteristics (trust in, support from, stigma from, and connectedness among network members), but not respondent socio-demographics or HIV disease characteristics. The intervention was associated with greater prevention advocacy when trust in, support from, and connectedness among alters were high, and stigma from alters was low.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of helping PLWH cope with self-stigma and gain comfort with disclosure, as well as the potential influence of network support, trustworthiness, connectedness, and stigmatization on engagement in prevention advocacy.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Springer
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2021
  • Pages: 9
  • Document Number: EP-68616

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.