Cover: The Implications of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks for California

The Implications of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks for California

A Collection of Issue Papers

Published 2002

by K. Jack Riley, Bruce W. Bennett, Mark Alan Hanson, Stephen J. Carroll, Lloyd Dixon, Scott Gerwehr, Russell W. Glenn, Jamison Jo Medby, John V. Parachini

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

RAND has been instrumental in developing a line of research regarding terrorism. This collection of issue papers extends that research. Although the issue papers focus on California, the lessons are drawn from experience in various parts of the United States and from other countries, and they clearly have national implications. Each issue paper focuses on a different policy aspect. Three focus on the economy, including the effects of September 11 on the travel and tourism industry in California, on the U.S. airline industry in relation to the California economy, and on the possible limited availability of insurance on California’s economy. Others address California’s preparedness for attacks by weapons of mass destruction, access and control of dangerous biological materials, and California’s capabilities for coping with the psychological effects of terrorism. This collection of issue papers compellingly illustrates that there is work to be done to improve our understanding of terrorism’s longer-term effects, but that some of the consequences feared in the initial days and weeks after the attacks of September 11, 2001, are not likely to materialize. In both these regards, research will continue to play a vital role in shaping the development of appropriate long-term policy responses.

The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND Public Safety and Justice.

This report is part of the RAND issue paper series. The issue paper was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that contained early data analysis, an informed perspective on a topic, or a discussion of research directions, not necessarily based on published research. The issue paper was meant to be a vehicle for quick dissemination intended to stimulate discussion in a policy community.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.