Download
Download eBook for Free
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.4 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback134 pages | $30.00 | $24.00 20% Web Discount |
In 2001, RAND helped the United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence (MOD) evaluate different acquisition strategies that it might use to acquire the new-generation Type 45 destroyer. RAND's analyses helped in determining whether the MOD should have the Type 45 built by one company or two, whether it should compete the 12 ships in the class or directly allocate work to specific shipbuilders, and whether companies producing the Type 45 should construct the destroyer in its entirety in one shipyard or from blocks produced in several shipyards.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
The Shipbuilding Industrial Base and the MOD Shipbuilding Programme
Chapter Three
Identifying and Analysing MOD's Acquisition Choices
Chapter Four
Analysis of Procurement Alternatives
Chapter Five
The Approved Type 45 Programme
Chapter Six
Issues Requiring Further Study
Appendix A
Sensitivity Analysis
Appendix B
Long-Term Implications of a Lack of Competition
Appendix C
Building Ships in Blocks at Multiple Sites: Implications for the Type 45 Programme
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was prepared for the United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence and conducted by RAND Europe.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.