Low fertility in Europe

Is there still reason to worry?

Stijn Hoorens, Jack Clift, Laura Staetsky, Barbara Janta, Stephanie Diepeveen, Molly Morgan Jones, Jonathan Grant

ResearchPublished Jun 16, 2011

Many European governments have been concerned about falling fertility rates, because of the welfare implications of an ageing population and a shrinking workforce. However, 'Doomsday' scenarios of fertility spiralling downwards and European populations imploding have not yet materialised. Recent statistics for childbearing even suggest some recovery in Europe's fertility. RAND Europe therefore decided to update its 2004 study into the causes and consequences of low fertility in Europe. The report analyses the latest data, reviewed recent literature, and examined the situation in Germany, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK in depth.

The recent recovery appears to be due to complex set of interacting factors, including economic growth, increased female labour participation, and improved gender equality in the work force. Policy and the fertility of migrants also had an effect, albeit limited. Policy makers should note that European couples are not necessarily having more children, but are having them later in life, and that rising fertility rates will not have an immediate impact on population ageing or its consequences.

The outlook for fertility in the EU as a whole is not as bleak as it was a decade ago, but fertility rates in several countries are still alarmingly low. These countries will need to continue exploring ways to remove the barriers to parenthood. Implementing measures that help both women and men to combine their career with their family life has direct effects for gender equality and labour force participation, but potential positive externalities for childbearing behaviour.

Key Takeaways

  • Declining fertility is a global phenomenon induced by a complex interplay of factors, and we still do not understand the drivers of fertility
  • Europe has seen a trend of recovery of aggregate period fertility, but policymakers should not overinterpret these indicators
  • More older women are bearing children, but fewer younger mothers
  • The trend of increasing childbearing at later ages is not a new phenomenon
  • Migration is not the main explanation for the recent recovery of period fertility
  • The association between economic growth and fertility has reversed in some countries
  • Policy matters, but probably only a little; the impact of individual policy measures tends to be fairly small
  • Enabling parents to combine labour participation and family duties has positive side-effects
  • Regardless of recent period fertility recovery, Europe’s population will continue to age

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hoorens, Stijn, Jack Clift, Laura Staetsky, Barbara Janta, Stephanie Diepeveen, Molly Morgan Jones, and Jonathan Grant, Low fertility in Europe: Is there still reason to worry? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1080.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.