Implementing and Evaluating an Innovative Approach to Simulation Training Acquisitions
ResearchPublished Mar 6, 2006
ResearchPublished Mar 6, 2006
This report describes an alternative business model for buying simulations and simulation training. This model seeks to align the financial incentives of industry participants with positive training and technology development outcomes. It proposes to do this by turning what has traditionally been the acquisition of training simulators into a service acquisition (the acquisition of training) with a private sector “tool vendor” marketplace to support it. The report examines the model in light of economic theory and of other business models related to the acquisition of training and simulations. In addition, it reviews academic literature and publicly available information about various simulation training initiatives, and it reports on interviews with those in industry and the Department of Defense with experience in developing, procuring, or using simulations for training. The report characterizes the “old” business model as being both fiscally wasteful and a hindrance to innovation. With the new business model, the DoD would stop buying both tools and training support and buy only training support; also, the DoD would stop buying training support with cost-plus contracts and start buying it on firm-fixed-price contracts. To ensure competition and innovation in the simulation tool market, the new model would separate the training support and tool markets, require compliance with adopted technical standards to guarantee product interoperability, and create a mechanism to inject seed money into the tool market.
The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.