Research Brief
The Cost of Producing New Airmen Can Be Reduced with a Better Mixture of On-the-Job Training and Schoolhouse Courses
Apr 8, 2007
Finding the Balance Between Schoolhouse and On-the-Job Training
Download
Full Document
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1.6 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback148 pages | $25.00 | $20.00 20% Web Discount |
The Air Force typically trains 30,000 to 40,000 new airmen in some 300 specialties each year. It utilizes two methods for training its enlistees: centralized initial skills training (IST, or “schoolhouse” training) and decentralized on-the-job training (OJT). All too often, only IST costs are considered when “pricing” training, seriously underestimating the overall cost to train an airman. When all the costs are considered, including those of OJT, decisions related to the length of IST can be better informed. To determine the most cost-effective combination of IST and OJT, the authors developed a methodology based on a cost-benefit analysis of seven Air Force specialties. From a statistical analysis of data taken from surveys of senior enlisted personnel, they were able to assess how productivity changes when IST course length changes and to make recommendations concerning the IST course lengths that would produce the most productive airmen for the least possible cost.
Related Products
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Review of the Literature
Chapter Three
A Survey to Determine Productivity and Effectiveness
Chapter Four
Calculating Total Cost
Chapter Five
Cost-Effective Course Lengths
Chapter Six
Recommendations and Conclusions
Appendix A
Air Force Specialty Code Descriptions
Appendix B
Survey Instrument
Appendix C
Defining “Fully Mission-Effective” or “Mission-Ready” Airmen
Appendix D
Data Cleaning
Appendix E
Statistical Results
Appendix F
Productivity Curves
Appendix G
Comments on Adding/Deleting Content from IST
Appendix H
Cost-Productivity Results for Seven AFSCs
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.