Are Ships Different?
Policies and Procedures for the Acquisition of Ship Programs
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||1 MB|
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback120 pages||$27.00||$21.60 20% Web Discount|
The management and oversight of a major defense acquisition program are exceedingly complex processes. The U.S. Department of Defense has a well-established set of policies, procedures, and organizations for program management and oversight, described in the "5000 series" of directives and instructions. Not all weapon systems fit comfortably within this framework, however. In particular, ship acquisition programs have characteristics that deviate from the normal framework, including concurrency of production and subsystem development, low production quantity and rate, varied test and evaluation procedures, and a unique relationship between milestone decision points and actual construction status. The authors explore these differences in detail, suggesting policies that can better account for the differences in ship acquisition programs without compromising oversight or establishing an entirely separate process.
Table of Contents
How Are Shipbuilding Acquisitions Treated Differently in Policy?
Ship Acquisition Alternatives
Conclusions and Recommendation
Summary of Other Acquisition Documents Relating to Shipbuilding Programs
Additional Ship and Nonship Program Data
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was prepared for Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and the United States Navy. The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.