Analysis of Youth Cohort Enlistment Intention Data
Progress Report
Published 1984
Progress Report
Published 1984
This Note documents a briefing on research investigating the relationship between survey data and respondents' subsequent enlistment decisions, attrition rates, and AFQT scores. The work should help identify possible applications of survey information in recruiting, aggregate enlistment forecasting, and as an outcome measure in policy option tests. AFQT, enlistment, attrition, and promotion information was linked with demographic and enlistment intention information for Youth Attitude Tracking Study (YATS) survey respondents. The intention information also was aggregated and matched with regional enlistment and economic data. The results indicate that enlistment intention information allows better prediction of YATS respondents' enlistment decisions and helps to predict attrition. They further suggest that AFQT category can be estimated statistically. Finally, preliminary analyses support a significant relationship between regional enlistment rates and concurrent regional enlistment intention levels. Future work should estimate these effects more precisely and investigate the extent of lagged effects.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.