Physician Response to a Mailed Survey

An Experiment in Timing of Payment

Sandra H. Berry, David E. Kanouse

Published 1987

This Note, which originally appeared in Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 51, reports the results of an experiment in obtaining physician response to a mailed questionnaire. Each physician was eligible for a payment of $20. A randomly selected half received the payment with their initial questionnaire and cover letter; half were told they would receive their payment after they completed and returned the questionnaire. The same mail and telephone follow-up procedures were used for both groups. Overall, prepayment had significant positive effects on response rates. This study examines these effects in terms of response rates for various specialties, field efficiencies, cost, and representativeness of the sample.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1987
  • Pages: 13
  • Document Number: N-2641-NIH

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Berry, Sandra H. and David E. Kanouse, Physician Response to a Mailed Survey: An Experiment in Timing of Payment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2641.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.