Physician Survey for Evaluating the NIH Consensus Development Program

Sandra H. Berry, Robert H. Brook, Mark R. Chassin, James P. Kahan, David E. Kanouse, John D. Winkler

Published 1987

This Note reprints the survey instrument used to collect data from physicians in RAND's evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Program, a technology assessment and dissemination program aimed at facilitating the timely translation of biomedical research into knowledge that can improve the practice of medicine and public health. The evaluation, sponsored by NIH's Office of Medical Applications of Research, examined the success of NIH's dissemination activities and the effects that NIH consensus conferences have had on physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1987
  • Pages: 32
  • Document Number: N-2502-NIH

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Berry, Sandra H., Robert H. Brook, Mark R. Chassin, James P. Kahan, David E. Kanouse, and John D. Winkler, Physician Survey for Evaluating the NIH Consensus Development Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2502.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.