Analysis, Analysis Practices, and Implications for Modeling and Simulation

Paul K. Davis, Amy Henninger

Expert InsightsPublished Apr 9, 2007

The Department of Defense’s modeling and simulation (M&S) should help find strategies that are flexible, adaptive, and robust; M&S should also deal well with complex warfare. Current M&S need to be augmented with a family-of-tools approach that includes human war gaming, man-in-the-loop simulations, simplified models and exploratory analysis, and high-resolution work on selected issues. Investment priorities should include integrative reviews to improve the base of knowledge, as well as a number of specific methods such as agent-based modeling and methods for representing network-centric operations.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Davis, Paul K. and Amy Henninger, Analysis, Analysis Practices, and Implications for Modeling and Simulation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP176.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers were products of RAND from 2003 to 2013 that included informed perspectives on a timely policy issue, discussions of new research methodologies, essays, papers presented at a conference, and summaries of work in progress.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.