The Economics of Early Childhood Policy

What the Dismal Science Has to Say About Investing in Children

M. Rebecca Kilburn, Lynn A. Karoly

ResearchPublished May 6, 2008

Scientific discoveries over the past two decades have transformed the way in which researchers, policymakers, and the public think about early childhood. For example, recent research in brain science has provided a biological basis for prevailing theories about early child development, and cost-benefit analysis has reoriented some of the discussion about early childhood toward prevention programs. Several recent reports have been particularly helpful in translating research findings into practical information that improves policy. This paper summarizes the contributions from the field of economics, which has played an increasingly prominent role in recent discussions about early childhood policy. The insights from economics also have broader implications for social programs focused on prevention, especially during childhood, rather than later-in-life remediation. This research will be of value to individuals who are interested in early childhood policy, including decisionmakers in the public and private sectors, service providers, and the public more generally.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Kilburn, M. Rebecca and Lynn A. Karoly, The Economics of Early Childhood Policy: What the Dismal Science Has to Say About Investing in Children, RAND Corporation, OP-227-CFP, 2008. As of September 17, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP227.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Kilburn, M. Rebecca and Lynn A. Karoly, The Economics of Early Childhood Policy: What the Dismal Science Has to Say About Investing in Children. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP227.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was sponsored by Casey Family Programs and was conducted within RAND Labor and Population, a unit of the RAND Corporation. This publication is based on a literature review and synthesis that was funded and comanaged by Casey Family Programs.

This publication is part of the RAND occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers were products of RAND from 2003 to 2013 that included informed perspectives on a timely policy issue, discussions of new research methodologies, essays, papers presented at a conference, and summaries of work in progress.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.