Incorporating Child Assessments into State Early Childhood Quality Improvement Initiatives
Feb 28, 2012
Better child outcomes are the ultimate goal of early care and education (ECE) quality improvement (QI) efforts, but assessing these outcomes is difficult and rarely done. This study identifies five strategies for incorporating child assessments into the design, implementation, and evaluation of QI initiatives such as quality rating and improvement systems. The study assesses the merits of each strategy and offers guidance for its use.
Approaches to Incorporating Child Assessments into State Early Childhood Quality Rating and Improvement Systems
|PDF file||0.5 MB|
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
Many studies have shown that higher-quality early care and education (ECE) predicts positive developmental gains for the children who experience it. However, much ECE in the United States is not of sufficiently high quality to produce these benefits. Quality rating and improvement systems (QRISs) attempt to improve practice and care quality in ECE settings; both are expected to improve child functioning. However, these systems rarely assess children to determine their effects because of the high costs and assessment burdens involved. Yet including child assessments in the design, implementation, and evaluation of QRISs or other quality improvement (QI) efforts could improve practice and raise care quality. The authors identify five strategies for states to consider for incorporating child assessments into QRISs or other QI approaches. Two of the strategies use assessments to inform classroom practice and to support program improvements. The remaining three use assessments to measure the effects of participating in a given classroom, program, or ECE system on child functioning. The authors' analysis of these strategies relies on research about measuring child functioning and methods for determining the contribution of ECE to developmental trajectories. It relies as well on new research concerning how states have included child assessments in their QRISs. Guidance is offered about when and how to incorporate the five approaches into a QRIS; the value of these approaches depends on the questions to be answered, the stage of the QRIS, and the availability of the resources needed to implement assessments and mount a rigorous research design.
The Ultimate Goal of State QRISs: Improving Child Developmental Outcomes
Approaches to Using Assessments of Child Functioning in State ECE QI Efforts
Conclusions and Policy Guidance
The research described in this report was conducted jointly by RAND Education and RAND Labor and Population, units of the RAND Corporation. Funding was provided by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.