Administrative Policies for Increasing the Use of Microcomputers in Instruction
ResearchPublished 1986
ResearchPublished 1986
This report describes the policy mechanisms available to district and school administrators to encourage more widespread use of microcomputers as an instructional tool in subject matter courses. It analyzes the value of offering various incentives to teachers, providing various forms of technical support, and involving the teaching staff in decisions about staff development and computer use. The report describes the consequences of such policies for increasing teacher participation in inservice computer training and for increasing the use of microcomputers for instruction in mathematics, science, social studies, and language arts in the elementary and secondary grades. The findings suggest that (1) districts and schools should continue to acquire microcomputers and educational courseware; (2) computer-using teachers should be provided with centralized, routine assistance in integrating computers into instruction; (3) district inservice training should be available; and (4) administrators should seek ways to compensate computer-using teachers.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.