Measuring Case Mix and Quality of Care

Rater Training and Reliability in the Graduate Medical Education Study

Toni Richards, Nicole Lurie, William H. Rogers, Robert H. Brook, Lisa S. Meredith, George I. Monsivais, David Reboussin, Toshi Hayashi

ResearchPublished 1987

This report reviews the training of raters and the instructions associated with each instrument and assess the reliability of the quality-of-care and seriousness-of-illness measures in the Graduate Medical Education dataset. The authors found that reliability varied substantially from measure to measure. However, the overall reliability of the dataset is at least moderately good. In addition, the sources of unreliability lie with the instruments and the medical records as well as with the raters.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Richards, Toni, Nicole Lurie, William H. Rogers, Robert H. Brook, Lisa S. Meredith, George I. Monsivais, David Reboussin, and Toshi Hayashi, Measuring Case Mix and Quality of Care: Rater Training and Reliability in the Graduate Medical Education Study. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3446.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.