Cover: The impact of response options and location in a microcomputer interview on drinking drivers' alcohol use self-reports

The impact of response options and location in a microcomputer interview on drinking drivers' alcohol use self-reports

Published 1994

by Ron D. Hays, Robert M. Bell, Laural A. Hill, James J. Gillogly, Matthew W. Lewis, Grant N. Marshall, Ronald Nicholas, G. Alan Marlatt

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback7 pages Free

The impact of response options for and location of frequency of alcohol use items in a self-administered microcomputer interview were evaluated in a randomized, experimental study of 296 clients at a West Coast treatment site for drinking drivers. Respondents were asked about their frequency of alcohol use in the last 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days; three methodological factors randomized were: (1) how quantitative the response options were; (2) order of presentation of close-ended response options; and (3) relative placement of alcohol use items in the questionnaire. Results indicate that these methodological factors had minimal influence on self-reports of the frequency of alcohol use. Only two statistically significant effects out of 44 possible were observed. The findings of this study suggest that frequency-of-alcohol-use reports by drinking drivers yield similar information for a range of different response formats and location of the items in a microcomputer interview.

Originally published in: Alcohol and Alcoholism, v. 29, no. 2, 1994, pp. 203-209.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.