Cover: Derivation and properties of a brief health status assessment instrument for use in HIV disease

Derivation and properties of a brief health status assessment instrument for use in HIV disease

Published 1996

by Samuel A. Bozzette, Ron D. Hays, Sandra H. Berry, David E. Kanouse, Albert W. Wu

Purchase Print Copy

 Format
Add to Cart Paperback13 pages Free

Health status measures adapted from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) scales have been shown to be useful and highly reliable in human immunodeficiency virus-infected populations, but acceptance of these measures has been limited in part by concerns over investigator, patient, and data burden. The authors sought to address these concerns by reducing the number of items in the MOS scales rather than by reducing the number of domains covered. The authors selected items for the shorter scales based on the static and dynamic relationships to the longer scales and to indicators of clinical and functional status in 10,399 responses from 1,934 participants, as well as in relevant subpopulations. The resulting scales have a total of 21 items, as compared to 38 in the longer instrument. Correlations between the shorter and longer scales were excellent. At 0.78 to 0.85, the reliability of the subscales was lower than that of the full scales. However, compared to an index based on the longer scales, an index based on the subscales had identical reliability, yielded nearly identical values, and was as sensitive in detecting treatment differences in a clinical trial. The resulting instrument continues to cover disability, work, utilization, and health status, but is less than half the length of our previous comprehensive questionnaires.

Originally published in: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, v. 8, 1995, pp. 253-265.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.