The potential socio-economic impact of telemedicine in Canada
Dec 6, 2021
|PDF file||1.4 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Photo by Rido/Adobe Stock
The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly transformed many business sectors, including healthcare. Pre-pandemic, Canada was behind its international peers in its use of telemedicine. Now, many patient consultations, both primary and specialist, are conducted virtually. A key question is whether this increase in teleconsultations and other types of telemedicine will persist in Canada, and to what extent certain policy conditions could, and should, support a more permanent increase in the usage of telemedicine in the future.
RAND Europe researchers examined the potential impact of continued, long-term use of telemedicine in Canada. They found that, alongside the benefits from tools such as telemonitoring and digital health records, widespread use of teleconsultations could lead to significant benefits for Canadian patients, the Canadian economy and wider Canadian society. The findings directly contribute to the evidence base in telemedicine and virtual healthcare more generally.
The study's evidence review showed that in regard to patient outcomes, telemedicine is comparable, or even superior, to standard of care in the management of some chronic diseases, such as diabetes and heart failure.
Telemedicine is also associated with a relatively large acceptability among patients, and leads to high patient satisfaction, especially in ease of access to healthcare services. The reduced need to travel and the potential reduction in waiting time are important convenience factors for patients.
Teleconsultations can lead to a large reduction in travel and waiting times with potentially large productivity improvements and positive effects on economic output. The reduced travel times are also associated with substantial environmental benefits through lower emission outputs as people travel less by cars to get to appointments.
For some people, replacing face-to-face consultations with remote consultations will not be suitable though, and there will remain many health problems that will require an in-person inspection by a health practitioner to maintain a quality of care. Teleconsultations may also be more efficient when conducted within an already established doctor-patient relationship.
To estimate the economic value associated with the potential time saved from increased telemedicine use, researchers compared a future scenario of increased teleconsultations in primary care settings with a baseline pre-pandemic uptake of 4 per cent. They quantified the value of time saved using a macroeconomic computational general equilibrium model based on the Canadian economy.
The scenario had four different levels of increased uptake—5 per cent; 10 per cent; 25 per cent; and 50 per cent. The analysis showed that increasing uptake to 50 per cent could lead to total economic benefits of up to CAD 5bn annually for Canada.
Each year a relatively large proportion of Canadians use a hospital emergency department for visits that could appropriately be treated through a regular primary care provider (e.g. GP or family doctor). Care provided in emergency care for the same condition tends to be more expensive than care provided in primary care settings. Furthermore, every year a relatively large number of appointments with clinicians are missed. Evidence suggests that the option of teleconsultations could lead to fewer missed appointments and unnecessary emergency care visits.
The researchers calculated the direct healthcare cost savings that could result from fewer emergency department visits and missed appointments if teleconsultations could be offered to patients. For example, if 50 per cent of unnecessary emergency department visits or missed appointments could be averted through offering teleconsultations to Canadians, the Canadian healthcare system would save up to CAD 89m and CAD 58m respectively as a result.
At least 3 per cent of Canadians report that they have unmet health needs, of which unavailability of services in the area, long waiting times and distance and transportation are cited among the main factors influencing the perceived lack of care. Telemedicine could overcome geographic barriers and be particularly beneficial for patients in communities where clinician shortages exist, and in rural geographical locations. Furthermore, telemedicine can make it easier and more convenient for patients to engage with their healthcare providers, leading to more flexible and real-time care. Most Canadians are in favour of virtual healthcare visits, and about 40 per cent of Canadians say they would be willing to switch to virtual clinician visits for most of their health needs.
The researchers applied an emerging valuation method that calculates the well-being effects of things or events that do not have a direct market value, such as feelings or states of health. The approach is commonly referred to as the 'life satisfaction' or 'well-being valuation' approach and measures the monetary value that a person would have to be compensated with to have the same level of life satisfaction in the absence of a significant factor, such as not having a primary care provider available.
The researchers estimate that if 50 per cent of the population without current access to a local primary care provider could be provided access through teleconsultations, the aggregated well-being value across Canada would be CAD 611m per year.
Telemedicine has seen a significant increase in use since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly because it rapidly became a central means of providing healthcare to patients while employing measures such as lockdowns to contain the virus. However, many barriers could hinder wider uptake of telemedicine. This is despite the temporary lifting of some regulations by governments to allow for its broader use. Some of the barriers identified are universal, while others are specific to Canada.
The existing Canadian infrastructure that would be required for telemedicine applications, such as access to fixed and wireless broadband, is relatively well developed and suits most current telemedicine applications. However, there is a lack of integration, standardisation and interoperability of the technical infrastructure related to telemedicine across different regional jurisdictions. For instance, instead of a harmonised and standardised patient health record, there exists separate systems.
The shift to telemedicine could also be hindered by a lack of user-friendly solutions and lack of support for users. In addition, a lack of adequate skills and training among healthcare staff could adversely impact the development and use of telemedicine applications.
Those patients who most stand to benefit from telemedicine are often those who are least likely to be able to access and use it. For instance, for low-income individuals or households, the cost of buying suitable equipment to engage in telemedicine could be prohibitive. Other factors such as age, ethnicity, culture, language or religion can also have an impact on people's willingness to use telemedicine services, particularly if these aspects have not been considered during the development stage of the system.
There is also the challenge of a lack of digital health literacy among certain populations in Canada. Individuals with lower levels of digital literacy tend to come disproportionally from population groups with lower socio-economic status or education, ethnic minorities and older adults, putting them at greatest risk of exclusion from technological advancements.
The organisation and regulation of health services and professionals fall mainly under provincial jurisdiction in Canada. As such, healthcare professionals may need to go through various regulatory authorities to understand the applicable rules and, in some cases, to obtain permits or authorisation to practise in other provinces. Relatedly, interoperability standards are necessary so that practitioners (and patients) can have seamless access to electronic health record data wherever they are in the country.
Furthermore, there is a lack of clear reimbursement mechanisms for telemedicine procedures, both regarding the payment model used and the provincial implications deriving from it. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, payment systems predominantly encouraged face-to-face consultations.
Finally, there are potential issues with the privacy of personal health information for patients, providers and insurance companies, which could adversely affect patients' and clinicians' level of trust and willingness to adopt and use telemedicine systems.
Photo by Elnur/Adobe Stock
This independent research was subject to RAND Europe's rigorous evaluation process and does not imply endorsement of any product or service. During the research process RAND Europe had full editorial control and independence of the analyses performed and presented in the report.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research brief series. RAND research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.