Paid Duty Days for Army Guardsmen and Reservists
A Comparison of Fiscal Year 2000 with Fiscal Years 2010 to 2013
ResearchPublished Apr 3, 2017
This report examines how the number of paid duty days for Army guardsmen and reservists has changed over the past several years, compared with before 9/11. Excluding most of those serving on extended active duty, median paid duty days in FYs 2010–2013 were only slightly higher than the numbers from FY 2000. In all years, median paid duty days approximated the required statutory minimum of 39 days for guardsmen and 38 for reservists.
By law, members of the U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard must generally train 38 or 39 days per year, respectively, although some serve more or fewer days. Some have suggested, however, that few have served only 39 days or less per year in recent years. To see whether this was so, the authors compared the number of paid days of service for reservists and guardsmen in fiscal years (FYs) 2010–2013 against the number in FY 2000, which serves as a pre–9/11 baseline. To focus on those most likely to serve the statutory minimum, the authors excluded guardsmen and reservists who were mobilized, Active Guard and Reserve, Reserve Individual Mobilization Augmentees, and those who had not yet completed initial entry training, although some serving on other forms of extended active duty were included. The authors focused on paid duty days for the median soldier. In FY 2000, the median guardsman included in the analysis was paid for 39 duty days, the median reservist for 38 duty days. For FYs 2010–2013, these numbers were only slightly larger, by two to six days, depending on the year. Thus, median paid duty days in FYs 2010–2013 still approximated the statutory minimum number of training days. The historical data suggest that, in the future, the typical part-time Army guardsman or reservist who is not preparing to mobilize or serving on some other form of extended active duty will continue to serve somewhere around 38 to 39 days per year.
Key Findings
Excluding Most of Those Serving on Extended Active Duty, the Median Guardsman or Reservist Has Served Only a Few Days More in Recent Years than in FY 2000
- In FY 2000, the median guardsman included in the analysis was paid for 39 duty days, and the median reservist for 38 duty days — numbers that matched the respective statutory minimum training requirements for each component — although some served more and some less; to focus on those most likely to serve the statutory minimums, the analysis focused on those assigned to Selected Reserve units who were not mobilized, Active Guard and Reserve, or in the training pipeline (e.g., conducting initial entry training).
- In FYs 2010–2013, fewer soldiers met the above criteria in a given year, largely because many more were mobilized in a given year than in FY 2000. Nonetheless, for those who met the criteria, the medians increased by only two to six days, depending on the year — ranging from 41 to 45 days for guardsmen and from 40 to 42 days for reservists; again, many served more days than the median, and many served fewer days.
- The historical data suggest that, in the future, the typical part-time Army guardsman or reservist who is not preparing to mobilize or serving on some other form of extended active duty will continue to serve somewhere around 38 to 39 days per year.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Year: 2017
- Pages: 12
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1409
- Document Number: RR-1409-A
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Klimas, Joshua, Thomas F. Lippiatt, Laurie L. McDonald, and Jerry M. Sollinger, Paid Duty Days for Army Guardsmen and Reservists: A Comparison of Fiscal Year 2000 with Fiscal Years 2010 to 2013, RAND Corporation, RR-1409-A, 2017. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1409.html
Klimas, Joshua, Thomas F. Lippiatt, Laurie L. McDonald, and Jerry M. Sollinger, Paid Duty Days for Army Guardsmen and Reservists: A Comparison of Fiscal Year 2000 with Fiscal Years 2010 to 2013. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1409.html.
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by the U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8, Army Quadrennial Defense Review Office, and conducted by the Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program within the RAND Arroyo Center.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.