This report provides information and recommendations on the evaluation design of the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) demonstration. Mandated by Congress, the CCBHC is a new model of specialty behavioral health clinic, designed to provide comprehensive and integrated behavioral health care for adults and children. Evaluation of the CCBHC demonstration will inform policymakers' decisions regarding continuation of the program.

Evaluation Design Recommendations for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Demonstration Program

Joshua Breslau, J. Scott Ashwood, Courtney Ann Kase, Harold Alan Pincus, Susan L. Lovejoy

ResearchPublished Aug 12, 2016

This report provides information and recommendations regarding the evaluation design of the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) demonstration. Mandated by Congress in Section 223 of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, the CCBHC is a new model of specialty behavioral health clinic, designed to provide comprehensive and integrated care for adults with mental health or substance-use disorders and children with serious emotional distress. Certification criteria for the CCBHCs have been specified by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration covering six core areas: staffing; accessibility; care coordination; scope of services; quality and other reporting; and organizational authority, governance, and accreditation. In addition, services provided to Medicaid enrollees in CCBHCs will be reimbursed through one of two alternative prospective payment systems. At present, 24 states have been awarded grants to begin the planning process for implementing CCBHCs. Of these states, eight will be selected to participate in the demonstration project beginning in January 2017. Results from the evaluation will inform mandated reports to Congress over the two-year demonstration period and the three years following the end of the demonstration, providing information to policymakers on the program's impact and value. In addition, the results can inform the direction of future efforts at integration of behavioral health into the health care system at this critical time of transformation.

Key Findings

  • Enormous variability exists across states in the availability of data that could potentially inform the CCBHC evaluation, including variability in Medicaid claims data, other human services utilization data, and health and social functioning outcomes data.
  • The CCBHCs are being implemented at a time when multiple service delivery innovations that target the same or overlapping patient populations are being tested. This context should be taken into account in the design of the evaluation.
  • Implementation questions may be addressed through a combination of existing data sources, including documentation of compliance with certification criteria, required quality measure reporting from the CCBHCs and the states, and cost reports. Supplemental data sources, such as quarterly reports from CCBHCs, surveys of providers, or qualitative studies of selected CCBHCs may also prove valuable.
  • Impact questions can be addressed through data from Medicaid claims or encounters covered by managed care payments. Detailed analytic plans, including selection of comparison groups, will need to be informed by conditions within demonstration states regarding the delivery system and data availability.

Recommendations

  • We recommend that the evaluation of the CCBHC demonstration project have three components. First, the evaluation should compile profiles of the mental health systems in each of the demonstration states. Second, the implementation questions can be addressed through a mix of existing data sources and supplemental data collection efforts. Third, the impact questions can be addressed primarily through analysis of the claims and encounter data, with additional information drawn from cost reports or, potentially, other state specific data sets.
  • The evaluation of the CCBHC demonstration can be efficient by making maximum use of existing data to reduce costs in describing the implementation of the model and its impact on care. The ultimate evaluation design will depend on the data sources available in the eight states selected for the demonstration and the resources available for the evaluation.
  • The evaluation has the potential to impact policies in the behavioral health arena in a fundamental way, providing guidance on the value of strengthening and growing the traditional model of CMHCs through expansion of their scope and reform of their financial structure.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2016
  • Pages: 110
  • ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-9564-0
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1439
  • Document Number: RR-1439-ASPEC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Breslau, Joshua, J. Scott Ashwood, Courtney Ann Kase, Harold Alan Pincus, and Susan L. Lovejoy, Evaluation Design Recommendations for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Demonstration Program, RAND Corporation, RR-1439-ASPEC, 2016. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1439.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Breslau, Joshua, J. Scott Ashwood, Courtney Ann Kase, Harold Alan Pincus, and Susan L. Lovejoy, Evaluation Design Recommendations for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Demonstration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2016. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1439.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) and conducted by RAND Health.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.