Proposition 47 is designed to reduce state prison overcrowding, focus criminal justice expenditures on violent and serious offenses, and increase investments in prevention and support programs. This report recommends how to measure the impact of Proposition 47 (and future legislative mandates) on Los Angeles County operations and budgets and what metrics should be tracked.

Impact of Proposition 47 on Los Angeles County Operations and Budget

Sarah B. Hunter, Lois M. Davis, Rosanna Smart, Susan Turner

ResearchPublished Jun 15, 2017

Proposition 47 is part of a sweeping series of criminal justice reforms passed in California over the last five years designed to reduce state prison overcrowding, focus criminal justice expenditures on violent and serious offenses, and increase investments in prevention and support programs. In September 2016, the Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office contracted with the RAND Corporation to conduct an independent operational and fiscal analysis of Proposition 47 as a follow-up review of preliminary reports by Los Angeles County's Department of the Auditor-Controller. Our overall objective was to draw insights from Los Angeles County departments' experiences with Proposition 47 to develop a set of recommendations for metrics and data management systems that Los Angeles County can use to track the operational and fiscal impacts of Proposition 47 and other legislative initiatives. We found that establishing performance metrics would help the county monitor the impact of Proposition 47 and similar initiatives. In addition, a database that protects individual privacy rights and identifies individuals and links data over time across the different county departments is needed.

Key Findings

  • Metrics are needed to measure enhancement of public order and safety; provision of the opportunity for Proposition 47 legal relief to all potentially eligible individuals; improvement of offender service provision, reintegration, and rehabilitation; improvement of efficiencies in the justice system within and across agencies; and reducing nonserious, nonviolent offenders' costs to the justice system.
  • In order to measure the impact of Proposition 47 cases, a database that protects individual privacy rights and identifies individuals and links data over time across the different county departments is needed.

Recommendations

Establishing performance metrics would help the county monitor the impact of Proposition 47 and similar initiatives. While the goals and metrics outlined below are suggested based on review of the literature and on understanding of Proposition 47, our recommended indicators are defined broadly, so they can apply to continual monitoring of justice system performance or can be refined to apply to any target population (such as Proposition 47 individuals).

  • Goal One: Enhance public order and safety.
  • Goal Two: Provide the opportunity for Proposition 47 legal relief to all potentially eligible individuals.
  • Goal Three: Improve offender service provision, reintegration, and rehabilitation.
  • Goal Four: Improve efficiencies in the justice system within and across agencies.
  • Goal Five: Reduce nonserious, nonviolent offenders' costs to the justice system.

In order to measure the impact of Proposition 47 cases, a database that protects individual privacy rights and identifies individuals and links data over time across the different county departments is needed.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Hunter, Sarah B., Lois M. Davis, Rosanna Smart, and Susan Turner, Impact of Proposition 47 on Los Angeles County Operations and Budget, RAND Corporation, RR-1754-LAC, 2017. As of September 16, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1754.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Hunter, Sarah B., Lois M. Davis, Rosanna Smart, and Susan Turner, Impact of Proposition 47 on Los Angeles County Operations and Budget. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1754.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research reported here was conducted by the Justice Policy Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.