Cover: RAND Model of Automated Vehicle Safety (MAVS)

RAND Model of Automated Vehicle Safety (MAVS)

Model Documentation

Published Nov 7, 2017

by Nidhi Kalra, David G. Groves

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

نموذج مؤسسة RAND لسلامة المركبات الممكننة: توثيق النموذج

Arabic language version

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Questions

  1. How can we model the factors shaping HAV diffusion and performance to estimate different safety outcomes over time?
  2. How could such a model be used to examine the safety implications of these uncertain factors?

Highly automated vehicle (HAV) safety is a principal concern for the transportation industry, policymakers, and the public. Much of the concern is focused on the question of how safe HAVs should be before they are allowed on the road for consumer use. However, the safety performance and impact of HAVs will change over time and may have much greater effects in the long term than in the short term. Thus, to address this concern properly, stakeholders must also ask how safe HAVs will become over time and how policy choices made today could shape the future of road safety.

To help answer these questions, this report describes a simple model of how factors shaping HAV diffusion and performance may interact and result in different safety outcomes over time. It can be used to measure safety in terms of injuries, crashes, or other metrics. Importantly, the model does not predict the pace of future HAV diffusion, the rate of change in safety performance, or other factors. Instead, given a user's hypotheses, it estimates how many lives would be lost each year in a future with and without HAVs. The model helps users explore how different assumptions lead to different outcomes and which factors may lead to greater or lesser safety. Such insights can help users consider how policies might shape HAV diffusion and performance to improve safety now and over time.

Key Findings

Model Results Will Differ Based on User Inputs

  • The model uses the following user-specified inputs: the growth in vehicle miles traveled in a baseline future without HAVs, the change in safety rate of non-HAVs, the timing and extent of HAV diffusion, the impact of HAVs on transportation demand, the safety performance of HAVs initially and over time, and the upgradeability of HAVs.
  • Illustrations of model use show that the future may unfold in complex and important ways that are not obvious when attention is paid only to safety at the time of HAV introduction. Such information might raise different policy questions, such as how policies can be crafted to encourage rapid learning or how trade-offs should be made between smaller short-term risks that may lead to larger longer-term gains.

This project is a RAND Venture. Funding was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The research was conducted by the Science, Technology, and Policy Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This report is part of the RAND research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.