Understanding value in health data ecosystems

A review of current evidence and ways forward

Sonja Marjanovic, Ioana Ghiga, Miaoqing Yang, Anna Knack

ResearchPublished Apr 27, 2017

The potential of health data to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health research and development, healthcare delivery, and health systems more widely is substantial. There are many initiatives across the EU that are experimenting with ways to capture value and address the nexus of technical, legal, ethics-related, governance and data protection-related, and cultural challenges to delivering potential benefits for society and the economy. The field of health data research and policy is highly dynamic and there is a need for further reflection, thematic learning and evaluation to better understand how to create and connect receptive places, to inform future interventions and to identify transferable lessons. Our research emphasises that realising the benefits of health data at scale will require: a simultaneous focus on the technological and structural conditions that are required; collaboration and coordination to transform working cultures and build health and care workforce and citizen capacity to engage with data; and efforts to ensure that policy, industry, and research communities respond to public concerns, needs, and expectations in a timely and sustained manner. The global community of individuals and organisations with a stake in health data will also need to consider how progress can benefit different populations across the world in an equitable manner.

Key Takeaways

  • The literature on health data generation and use identifies a myriad of potential social and economic benefits, spanning three broad categories: (i) benefits for various stages of the R&D process, (ii) benefits for pharmacovigilance and public health and (iii) benefits for healthcare delivery and the health ecosystem more widely. Within each category, we discuss diverse potential benefit types.
  • Creating sustainable and effective health data ecosystems will require: (i) considering the value propositions presented by health data in the context of interdependencies and interactions between stakeholders and sectors, (ii) building on existing efforts and momentum to address data quality and technical considerations, (iii) making the most of recent data protection advancements and considering models of data sharing, (iv) considering workforce capacity-building by supporting professionals in making the most out of health data and (v) learning from previous efforts to increase public awareness, acceptability and engagement with health data.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2017
  • Pages: 64
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1972
  • Document Number: RR-1972-EFPIA

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Marjanovic, Sonja, Ioana Ghiga, Miaoqing Yang, and Anna Knack, Understanding value in health data ecosystems: A review of current evidence and ways forward. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1972.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.