How can the success (or failure) of Army special operations missions be assessed? The authors develop a methodology for doing so that relies on operational, intelligence, and ambient (publicly available) data. The method assesses the plan's lines of effort and their objectives, develops measures of effectiveness and indicators, and then gathers and analyzes appropriate qualitative and quantitative data.
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
Does not include Appendixes.
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 2.8 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Appendixes
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.6 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Synopsis
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback150 pages | $25.50 | $20.40 20% Web Discount |
Research Question
- How can the success (or failure) of Army special operations missions be assessed?
How can the success (or failure) of Army special operations missions be assessed? The authors develop a methodology for doing so that relies on operational, intelligence, and ambient (publicly available) data, since operational level special operations commands often lack robust staff and resources to generate assessment-specific information. The method assesses the plan's lines of effort and their objectives, develops relevant measures of effectiveness and indicators, and gathers appropriate qualitative and quantitative data. The resulting analysis is presented to the appropriate commander, who can then use the information to adjust lines of effort or activities and other elements. The seven-step process is illustrated through a fictional scenario. Implementation will include incorporating the approach into doctrine and training and standing up an assessment cell. The cell requires access to data streams and appropriate analytic platforms and reachback support.
Key Findings
Conducting assessments can be challenging for smaller deployed headquarters
- Conducting rigorous and timely assessments is a particular challenge for smaller deployed headquarters with smaller staffs and budgets.
- Collecting data and staffing the assessment process consume scarce resources and manpower.
- The methodology developed leverages existing operational and intelligence reporting and publicly available data for assessments.
Recommendation
- Implementing the special operations forces operational assessment approach recommended in this report will require adaptations in organization, training, materiel, leadership development and education, and personnel.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Line of Effort–Based Assessment Approach
Chapter Three
Measures of Effectiveness for SOF Assessment
Chapter Four
Seven-Step Assessment Process
Chapter Five
Sample Assessment
Chapter Six
Final Considerations
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by U.S. Army Special Operations Command and conducted by the Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program within the RAND Arroyo Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.