Cover: Insider Threat and White-Collar Crime in Non-Government Organisations and Industries

Insider Threat and White-Collar Crime in Non-Government Organisations and Industries

A Literature Review

Published Feb 16, 2022

by Marigold Black, Jade Yeung, Douglas Yeung

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Questions

  1. How are insider threats and white-collar crime defined?
  2. What elements of insider threats and white-collar crime need to be understood to effectively address these challenges?
  3. How is the insider threat and white-collar crime threat environment changing?
  4. What strategies and approaches hold promise?

In this report, the authors describe the recent literature on insider threats and white-collar crime in non-government organisations and industries and identify management strategies used to counter them, both internationally and in the Australian context. The objective is to provide the Australian Department of Defence and the broader research and practitioner community with (1) access to sources that will generate greater understanding of the depth and breadth of the potential risks of insider threats and white-collar crime and (2) a scholarly evidence base on which to build strategies for better detection, management and prevention.

The authors analyse and evaluate recent Australian and international sources on insider threats and white-collar crime, concentrating on articles, reports and accounts that help define these threats and provide important context for management and mitigation strategies and emerging risks.

Key findings include challenges with identifying causal mechanisms due to the paucity of publicly available data; the importance of devising management strategies that engage with human and technical dimensions; the relative efficacy of self-regulatory approaches that generate a strong security culture; and the importance of recognising ethical and privacy concerns that can arise with increased use of new technologies, such as cybervetting.

Key Findings

  • Definitional ambiguity persists on what constitutes a white-collar crime or insider threat. As a result, data sets are sometimes incomparable, which hampers the discovery of causal mechanisms.
  • Understanding indicators, motivations and characteristics for white-collar criminals and malicious insiders means understanding the threat type, the psychology of the perpetrator and changes in the threat landscape.
  • Because of the sociotechnical nature of both white-collar crime and insider threats, the profile of the criminal and the offence is constantly changing.
  • Rules-based management approaches are important, but self-regulatory approaches are more effective, as they foster a positive work environment.
  • Positive deterrence complements the use of negative deterrence by improving employees' satisfaction, performance and commitment to the organisation.

Recommendations

  • Emphasise reducing motivation and opportunity as much as possible when developing mitigation strategies.
  • Understand points of vulnerability and susceptibility, and develop response models that foster trust and leverage the workforce as a partner.
  • Recognise that individuals do not typically begin in a role with the intention of committing a crime of this nature.
  • Identify positive predispositions, as they may be harnessed to inhibit counterproductive behaviours and generate proactive motivational states.
  • Develop effective reporting mechanisms, and recognise that staff observations can be critical in detecting counterproductive and criminal behaviours.
  • Leverage innovations in technology and data-gathering mechanisms to find opportunities for early intervention in security clearance processes, but pay commensurate attention to the ethical and privacy concerns that arise.
  • Ensure that management and mitigation strategies engage with human, technical and organisational dimensions.
  • Maintain awareness of international best practices, and commit to information sharing.

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the Australian Department of Defence and was conducted by RAND Australia.

This report is part of the RAND research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.