The United States' newest military service, the U.S. Space Force (USSF), has a unique opportunity to take advantage of the widening range of commercial capabilities and create a new culture and new management processes to respond to the growing challenges presented by potential adversaries in space. The authors describe an unconstrained "clean sheet" approach to space acquisition for USSF designed around the new service's unique mission.
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Synopsis
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback88 pages | $17.50 | $14.00 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- What is the overall vision of the clean sheet approach for USSF?
- What are the challenges of the past and current DoD space acquisition?
- What acquisition approach should USSF adopt to ensure the timely availability of necessary capabilities?
The United States' newest military service, the U.S. Space Force (USSF), has a unique opportunity to take advantage of the widening range of commercial capabilities and create a new culture and new management processes to respond to the growing challenges presented by potential adversaries in space. To support this effort, USSF leadership asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to develop a "clean sheet" acquisition approach designed around the unique mission and calling of the new service. The recommendations in this report derive from a literature review and interviews with more than 45 current and retired senior leaders and space acquisition experts. The authors' clean sheet vision recognizes that potential adversaries are increasingly investing in space capabilities and that the pace of commercial innovation is increasing. USSF relies on space technology as a foundation to develop and sustain its joint warfighting capabilities and thus needs an acquisition approach focused on ensuring that the required capabilities are available when needed. To be effective in this context, acquisition processes must be rapid, agile, and, above all, threat-informed. The authors offer a new clean sheet acquisition vision for the technology-centric USSF—acquisition as a warfighting capability rather than a support function.
Key Findings
The establishment of USSF offers an opportunity to create a new, more responsive approach to space acquisition.
- This new approach depends on USSF developing a culture of risk tolerance and agile and responsive enterprise decisionmaking.
- The culture must be fueled with select personnel inculcated with USSF's goals.
- This approach presents a chance for increased access and partnering with industry to accelerate technology insertion into systems.
Several features of USSF set it apart from other U.S. military services
- USSF will be significantly smaller than any other service and will have fewer people for processes that traditionally have been manpower intensive.
- A smaller service offers the opportunity for increased agility and the reduced bureaucracy resulting from a flatter organization and a shorter chain of command.
USSF is highly reliant on technology, even more so than other services
- USSF uses technology to develop and sustain its joint warfighting capabilities.
- This dependence on technology necessitates USSF having a close, trusting, collaborative relationship with industry.
- A service with technology as a foundation for warfighting warrants an acquisition approach focused on ensuring that the required capabilities are available when needed—therefore, the processes must be rapid, agile, and threat-informed.
Recommendations
- USSF should remove the seams traditionally separating operators and acquirers so that all understand both technology and operations.
- USSF should create an adaptive technical architecture, based on warfighting doctrine and concept of operations, to provide a framework for decisionmaking and countering the threat and a road map for innovation.
- USSF should establish a single space acquisition decisionmaker for flexible management of the enterprise—focusing resources on the highest priorities, driving capability synchronization, and radically delegating to empowered subordinates.
- USSF should ensure that it has a workforce consisting of experts who are cultivated through selective recruiting, assignments, training, and promotions to be risk tolerant, flexible, collaborative, and enterprise-focused.
- USSF should build internal and external outreach mechanisms, including information-sharing and metrics, that emphasize strong relationships and mutual trust within and across the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Department of Defense, USSF, the Intelligence Community, other federal agencies, and industry.
- USSF should foster a trusting, collaborative relationship with industry—for example, by providing industry with a technology road map that includes (1) innovation on-ramps to accept emerging technology or address changing threats and (2) divestiture off-ramps for obsolete capability.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Background
Chapter Two
The Clean Sheet Vision: Acquisition as a Warfighting Capability
Chapter Three
Rapid, Enterprise-Centric Decisionmaking
Chapter Four
Talent Management
Chapter Five
Interactions with Industry and Other Government Agencies
Chapter Six
Implementing the Clean Sheet
Chapter Seven
Conclusions
Research conducted by
The research reported here was commissioned by the Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) and conducted within the Resource Management Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.