Reserve Retirement Reform

A Viewpoint on Recent Congressional Proposals

Beth J. Asch, James Hosek, David S. Loughran

ResearchPublished 2006

More intensive use of the reserve components in national defense in recent years has resulted in greater attention being paid to the adequacy and efficiency of the reserve compensation system. Four bills are pending in Congress to reduce the age when reservists can begin to receive retirement benefits. One would allow reservists to begin receiving retirement pay immediately upon completing 20 years of creditable service, with the last six years as a member of a reserve component. Two related proposals would lower the retirement annuity age to 55. Another would set the retirement age on a sliding scale that depended on years of service (YOS); those with more YOS can retire earlier, as early as age 54. This report provides input regarding these proposals and the broader issues surrounding reserve retirement reform. The authors found that the per-capita cost of the current retirement system is dramatically less than the per-capita cost under the immediate annuity and age-55 proposals. The per-capita cost of the sliding-age alternative is the least expensive of the three alternatives, reflecting the low prevalence of new retirees below age 60 with sufficient YOS to qualify for retirement at ages below 60. Although it is important to recognize that deferring some portion of compensation can be cost-effective, the results argue in favor of providing compensation on a current basis rather than on a deferred basis.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2006
  • Pages: 82
  • Document Number: TR-199-OSD

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Asch, Beth J., James Hosek, and David S. Loughran, Reserve Retirement Reform: A Viewpoint on Recent Congressional Proposals. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR199.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.