Improving the Achievement of Tennessee Students

Analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress

David W. Grissmer, Ann Flanagan

ResearchPublished May 19, 2006

This study evaluates the performance of Tennessee’s students using data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and explores the factors contributing to differences in this performance relative to other states to identify potential improvements in policy and spending decisions. It compares Tennessee’s performance on selected NAEP tests with that of other participating states in the region and nation, and compares surveys of teachers and data on family characteristics and state-level spending on educational resources (such as teacher salaries, pupil-teacher ratios, and pre-kindergarten enrollment). This study employs statistical models using state-level data to investigate the role of family background and educational resource measures in achievement differences. While it is intended to benefit Tennessee policymakers, this study, which builds on prior RAND research, may be of interest to policymakers from other states for its approach and its comparisons of achievement and other measures across states. The appendix provides descriptions of the methodology, data, and estimation results that support the study’s analysis.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Grissmer, David W. and Ann Flanagan, Improving the Achievement of Tennessee Students: Analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, RAND Corporation, TR-381-EDU, 2006. As of September 14, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR381.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Grissmer, David W. and Ann Flanagan, Improving the Achievement of Tennessee Students: Analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR381.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was carried out by the RAND Corporation under the auspices of RAND Education and supported by the Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.