Teacher Pension Workshop: Connecting Evidence-Based Research to Pension Reform
Apr 19, 2018
Pension Math: Public Pension Spending and Service Crowd Out in California, 2003-2030
|PDF file||2.6 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
For more than a decade, California state and local governments have faced a growing pension challenge. Public pension plans throughout the state provide generous benefits, yet are funded on the basis of policies and assumptions that can delay recognition of their true cost. This has led to local and state government pension contributions that have already increased substantially, both in dollar terms and as a share of operating expenditures, and that will almost certainly continue to increase over the next one to two decades. This Working Paper focuses on this challenge through multiple case studies, covering both state and local governments. The case studies demonstrate a marked increase in both employer pension contributions and unfunded pension liabilities over the past 15 years, and they reveal that in almost all cases that costs will continue to increase at least through 2030, even under the assumptions used by the plans' governing bodies—assumptions that critics regard as optimistic. It examines the impacts of increased pension contributions on other expenditures, including services traditionally considered part of state and local government's core mission. Pension costs have crowded out and will likely to continue to crowd out resources needed for public assistance, welfare, recreation and libraries, health, public works, other social services, and in some cases, public safety.
Case Study: State of California
County Case Studies
City Case Studies
School District Case Studies
Case Study: Special Districts
Case Study Observations
Appendixes—Case Study Tables
This research was conducted by RAND Education.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.