Did the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008 Reduce Labor Supply?
Evidence from Quantile Panel Data Estimation
Download eBook for Free
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.3 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Download Support Files
QRPD Code
This code implements the quantile panel data regression estimator in Stata.
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| zip file | 0.1 MB | The file(s) provided above are ZIP-formatted archives, which most modern systems can natively unpack. If your computer does not unpack the archive when you double-click it, you may need to use a separate decompression program such as UnZip. |
While the literature has found evidence that tax rebates and economic stimulus payments increase short-term consumer spending, the literature has ignored the possibility that household labor supply may also respond. This paper exploits the randomized timing of receipt of the 2008 economic stimulus payments and examine changes in household labor earnings by month in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Because it is unlikely that the effect is uniform throughout the earnings distribution, it estimates quantile treatment effects. The empirical strategy requires conditioning on household fixed effects so it introduces a new instrumental variables quantile regression technique for panel data (QRPD) which maintains the nonseparable disturbance term commonly associated with quantile estimation. This property is crucial to estimating the parameters of interest and distinguishes itself from many of the quantile panel data estimators in the literature which rely on additive fixed effects. It finds that tax rebate receipt has significant impacts on labor supply.
This paper series was made possible by the NIA-funded RAND Center for the Study of Aging and the NICHD-funded RAND Population Research Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.