Cover: Toolkit on tackling error, fraud and corruption in social protection programs

Toolkit on tackling error, fraud and corruption in social protection programs

Published Apr 1, 2010

by Christian Van Stolk, Emil D. Tesliuc

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The World Bank commissioned RAND Europe to write a toolkit to assist in the assessment of interventions used to tackle error, fraud and corruption (EFC) in the social protection programmes of client countries. This report is aimed at assisting government officials who seek to improve EF&C control in their social protection programmes and World Bank staff in assessing EF&C control in client countries. It is a discussion piece that informs the wider debate on ensuring the integrity of social protection programmes. The toolkit builds on a report that RAND Europe undertook on fraud and error controls in social security systems of eight OECD countries for the UK National Audit Office (NAO) and is based on three recent missions that the World Bank and contractors have undertaken in the social security systems of the Ukraine, the Kyrgyz Republic and Bangladesh. The focus of the toolkit is particularly focused on fraud and error in social protection programmes and to a smaller degree on corruption. This report contains the written materials for a diagnostic toolkit aimed at the assessment of the mechanisms for combating EFC. It contains five substantive sections: an introduction; a discussion on building a framework to combat EFC; examples of effective instruments used to combat EFC; a section on how to set up a diagnostic missions; and examples from missions so far. The document is organised along a set of questions that an evaluator of EFC in social protection programmes might consider.

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the World Bank and was conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.