Cover: Let's Improve Tanner High School

Let's Improve Tanner High School

An Education Policy Game

Published Aug 6, 2020

by Brian M. Stecher, V. Darleen Opfer, Celia J. Gomez, Paul Youngmin Yoo

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 11.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

In FY18 the authors developed an education policy game that would reveal the perspectives of different stakeholder groups on current education issues. The larger purpose of this effort was to broaden the scope of the RAND Corporation's game development expertise and supplement the analytic tools available for researchers working in RAND's Education and Labor division. This document describes the game we developed, Let's Improve Tanner High School, and offers some thoughts on game development and improvement based a pilot test of the game conducted with RAND researchers and an operational use of the game with education stakeholders in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Research conducted by

Funding for this research was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The research was conducted by RAND Education and Labor.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.