Evidence-based Mental Health Programs in Schools

Barriers and Facilitators of Successful Implementation

Published in: School Mental Health, v. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2010, p. 105-113

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2010

by Audra K. Langley, Erum Nadeem, Sheryl H. Kataoka, Bradley D. Stein, Lisa H. Jaycox

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Although schools can improve children's access to mental health services, not all school-based providers are able to successfully deliver evidence-based practices. Indeed, even when school clinicians are trained in evidence-based practices (EBP), the training does not necessarily result in the implementation of those practices. This study explores factors that influence implementation of a particular EBP, Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS). Semi-structured telephone interviews with 35 site administrators and clinicians from across the United States were conducted 6-18 months after receiving CBITS training to discuss implementation experiences. The implementation experiences of participants differed, but all reported similar barriers to implementation. Sites that successfully overcame such barriers differed from their unsuccessful counterparts by having greater organizational structure for delivering school services, a social network of other clinicians implementing CBITS, and administrative support for implementation. This study suggests that EBP implementation can be facilitated by having the necessary support from school leadership and peers.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.