The Role of Law in Public Health Preparedness
Opportunities and Challenges
Published in: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, v. 37, no. 2, Apr. 2012, p. 298-328
Posted on RAND.org on April 01, 2012
- How does the law shape the public health system's preparedness activities and its response to public health threats?
We report the results of a study designed to assess and evaluate how the law shapes the public health system's preparedness activities. Based on 144 qualitative interviews conducted in nine states, we used a model that compared the objective legal environment with how practitioners perceived the laws. Most local public health and emergency management professionals relied on what they perceived the legal environment to be rather than on an adequate understanding of the objective legal requirements. Major reasons for the gap include the lack of legal training for local practitioners and the difficulty of obtaining clarification and consistent legal advice regarding public health preparedness. Narrowing the gap would most likely improve preparedness outcomes. We conclude that there are serious deficiencies in legal preparedness that can undermine effective responses to public health emergencies. Correcting the lack of legal knowledge, coupled with eliminating delays in resolving legal issues and questions during public health emergencies, could have measurable consequences on reducing morbidity and mortality.
- Public health preparedness activities are governed by a patchwork of federal and state laws/regulations.
- Most local public health officials rely on what they think the legal environment is, but their perception often does not match the actual laws enacted.
- Public health practitioners need education about the scope and provisions of existing laws.
- Answers to key legal questions need to be provided to practitioners and maintained in a catalog.
- Ways must be found to promptly resolve legal issues and questions before health emergencies occur.