Effects on School Outcomes in Low-Income Minority Youth

Preliminary Findings from a Community-Partnered Study of a School-Based Trauma Intervention

Published In: Ethnicity and Disease, v. 21, 3 Suppl. 1, Summer 2011, p. S1-71-77

Posted on RAND.org on June 01, 2011

by Sheryl H. Kataoka, Lisa H. Jaycox, Marleen Wong, Erum Nadeem, Audra K. Langley, Lingqi Tang, Bradley D. Stein

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To examine academic outcomes of a community-partnered school mental health intervention for students exposed to community violence. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixth-grade students (N = 123) from 2 middle schools in Los Angeles during the 2001-2002 academic year who had exposure to violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms in the clinical range. INTERVENTION: Students were randomized to either receive a 10-session standardized school trauma intervention (Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools) soon after screening (early intervention) or after a delay following screening (delayed intervention), but within the same school year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 59 students in the early intervention group vs. 64 students in the delayed intervention group (screened in September or December) were compared on spring semester grades in math and language arts, controlling for the students' standardized state test scores from the previous academic year and other covariates. RESULTS: Students in the early intervention group had a significantly higher spring semester mean grade in math (2.0 vs 1.6) but not language arts (2.2 vs 1.9). Students in the early intervention group were more likely than students in the delayed intervention group to have a passing grade (C or higher) in language arts (80% vs 61%; P < .033) by spring semester; we also found a substantial difference in the number of students receiving a passing math grade (70% vs 55%; P = .053). CONCLUSION: Through a collaborative partnership between school staff and researchers, preliminary evidence suggests that receiving a school trauma intervention soon after screening compared to delaying treatment can result in better school grades.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.