Geo-targeting Performance of Wireless Emergency Alerts in Imminent Threat Scenarios

Volume 2: Earthquake, Tsunami and Radiation Warnings

Published in: Geo-Targeting Performance of Wireless Emergency Alerts in Imminent Threat Scenarios (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate, May 2016), Volume 1, 122 p

Posted on on October 05, 2016

by Daniel Gonzales, Lisa Kraus, Jan Osburg, Dulani Woods

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A significant long-standing challenge for imminent threat alert originators (AOs) at all levels of government is how to quickly communicate warning messages to people in danger, while avoiding to warn those not at risk. Providing effective warnings of an imminent threat, such as a dangerous tornado, can save lives. Ideally, people can take shelter before the tornado strikes if they are provided enough warning time. People may receive irrelevant warnings and suffer from over-alerting, however. If over-alerting occurs, people's lives can be disrupted; they may decide the warnings they receive are not accurate and may ignore later warnings that actually apply to them. Several terms have been coined to describe the impact of over-alerting: warning fatigue or warning complacency. Warning fatigue has occurred in highly destructive and deadly tornadoes. People ignored warnings delivered by sirens because the sirens had sounded so many times on past occasions when no tornado appeared. The sirens have also been sounded over too large of an area in past tornadoes (over county-wide areas), and included areas where the public was not threatened. How can over-alerting and warning fatigue be reduced? One possible solution is to send tornado warnings as accurately geo-targeted Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEAs). This study shows that overalerting rates can be reduced if the geo-targeting capabilities of WEA are used effectively.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.